Main menu:

Brother William Cartoon

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Site search

Categories

Archive

WAS JESUS RACIST?

There’s a story in Matthew’s Gospel (15:21-28) that raises the question. Jesus and some disciples were hiking through the region of Tyre and Sidon. It was a cosmopolitan region – people from all over the Eastern Mediterranean. On their way a Canaanite woman accosted Jesus, pleading with him to heal her mentally disturbed daughter. The disciples were embarrassed and they urged Jesus to get rid of her. Jesus seems to have felt the same way. “I am only sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel,” he said, and added, “It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” It was not only racist; it was rather offensive. Was the woman to be regarded as a lower form of animal life because she was not Jewish? However, the woman was too concerned about her daughter to take offence. Picking up Jesus’ own metaphor she replied, “Yes Lord, but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”

A change of heart 

That brought Jesus up short. He stopped walking, I think, and I imagine him turning and looking at the woman with surprise and dawning respect. “Woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish.” And, Matthew says, her daughter was instantly healed.

What was really happening?

I would hate to think that Jesus was only making a single exception for this individual. I would like to think that he was beginning to realise that he was not only to be the saviour of Israel but the saviour of the whole world. Later he says, in John’s Gospel, “I, if I be lifted up, with draw all people to me.” (12:32)

This is not the only indication that Jesus’ understanding of his identity and vocation grew on him in stages. The most striking occasion occurred when he was baptised by John. Mark tells us that a voice from heaven said: “You are my Son, the Beloved, in you I am well pleased.” (1:11) (Son of God was a title for Messiah.)

Mark goes on to say that “the Spirit immediately drove Jesus out into the wilderness.” (1:12) It is as though he was quite shocked and was rushing off to be alone where he could think through the implications of this startling experience. He had known for a long time, from childhood probably (Luke 2:49) that he had an important vocation from God, and John had realised that too, but the voice from heaven was quite specific: Jesus was the Son of God, Messiah. While Jesus was in the desert he was tempted by several very bad ideas about how to go about being Messiah (Matt. 4:1-11). There was some serious thinking through to be done. It sounds like a learning experience, but also indicates a thorough knowledge of the Torah.

It also seems likely that his destiny to go to Jerusalem, where murderous enemies would hound him down and have him killed, became clear only on Horeb, the mount of transfiguration (Matt 17:1-8). The evidence of such a fate was to be found in the Law and the prophets if you knew where to look (this is indicated by the appearance of Moses and Elijah) but it would be natural if Jesus had, up to then, been reluctant to grasp the significance of such gloomy prophecies as Isaiah’s suffering servant (Is.53) and the evidence of Israel’s history of persecuting the prophets. Also, the Law contained a catch 22: to claim to be Messiah was blasphemy, so even the true Messiah would be sentenced to death (John 19:7).

I don’t think we have to believe that Jesus had known all this from infancy, even before he could talk. It seems quite reasonable to think that his understanding of what the Law and his vocation as the Son of God demanded developed in stages. The writer of the letter to the Hebrews says that Jesus “learned obedience through the things he suffered.” (Heb. 4:8)

So what?

What’s all that got to do with me? Paul refers to Christians as the body of Christ in numerous places, so we share in Jesus’ Messianic vocation.

When I was a boy I was taught how lucky I was to be a Christian, brought up in a Christian country, educated at the “religious, royal and ancient foundation” of Christ’s Hospital. I was instructed about various mysterious advantages like the gift of the Holy Spirit and everlasting life. Being a Christian seemed all pluses.

But, like everyone else, I discovered as a child that life has its ups and downs. Often the example of Jesus was extremely difficult to follow, and I failed all the time. I gradually realised that being a Christian demanded a different set of values from those of the general public, even the public school!

Like Jesus, I have learned obedience through the things I have suffered. It has been through failures, disappointments and personal mishaps more often than through success that I have made my most important discoveries.

I am still learning where my personal vocation is leading me. It will not be to the same horrible end that Jesus suffered, but it will contain similar ingredients. The loss of physical strength and other faculties leads to humiliating and sometimes painful situations. In my mid-eighties, I speak with some experience.

I am not a special person. What I have said of myself will find an echo (I hope) in most people of any age. We are all discovering in stages who we truly are and what our vocation in Christ is. When I think of Jesus losing his racist beliefs I feel quite complacent: I don’t have any Hansonish hang-ups. But when I think of the end of Jesus’ earthly life I am strongly challenged. In spite of constant challenges from the pulpit, I don’t think most church people regard the crucifixion as having much real relevance to their own lives. That was Jesus’ thing. But it can still be a challenge. Pain and humiliations occur at every stage of life, but a Christian understanding of them, and that they are, sometimes at least, part of the Messianic vocation, can make life seem more reasonable, more coherent, more meaningful.

 

You might like to

Read Isaiah 53

Reflect on your own experience and see if it has ever been in this sense “messianic”.

Pray to understand your life and vocation more clearly, and to find joy and hope in any growth of insight.

Comments

Comment from John Irvine
Time: September 2, 2008, 9:22 am

There are two ways in Eastern thought to look at this seemingly difficult passage.
The first covered by Brother William - the Avatar of God takes some time to discover his/her real identity.
The second is covered by the Lila - the Divine Play - a piece of Divine theatre where the moment is built up to give the teaching maximum effect.

This leads to an important observation I’ve made while looking at the Indian Baba’s, both past and present, although special and gifted incarnations, they remain deeply socialised into their Indian Culture.

One should not wonder that this also occurred to Jesus - who had the insight to rise above it!!

But I will have to challenge Brother William on an important point though - “I am not a special person.”

Brother William is very special - a unique individual who has freed his soul - surrounded by Creeds and Dogma - he cut through them and is now showing all how to fashion the sabre. His freed soul is standing on the central tablelands of the shared experience of the divine on this little orb!

I am astounded that Brother William is an octogenarian - his writing embodies eternal youth!

All Thanks to Brother William!!

Pingback from Recent Links Tagged With “sounds” - JabberTags
Time: September 12, 2008, 8:04 am

[...] public links >> sounds WAS JESUS RACIST? Saved by Mochtroid127 on Thu 11-9-2008 Denver Abuzz: A Perspective on the Sights, Sounds, and [...]

Comment from John Tracey
Time: October 5, 2008, 3:48 pm

Hello Brother William,

I am beginning to think that this story has been very much misunderstood and misinterpreted. Amongst the Samaritans were the lost 10 tribes of Israel, taken into slavery after the decline of the David/Solomon nation and later returned to their land. Samaria was known as the Kingdom of Israel and Judea was a different province.

jesus speaks over and over again of Samaritans and in John 8; 48 he is accused of being a Samaritan (which he does not seem to deny). Every time Jesus and the disciples travelled between Gallilee and jerusalem they walk through the territory of the Samaritans.

The essential conflict with the Samaritans and the Jews was about where cleansing and sacrifices occur, the Jews insisted it must occur at the temple in Jerusalem whereas the Samaritans had their own places in the mountains. But they all worshipped the same God, unlike the Gentiles who worshipped the Hellenic, Assyrian and Egyption Gods of empire. The Samaritans were considered unclean because they had not been cleansed in the Jerusalem temple.

This needs to be understood in the context of Jesus’ threats to destroy the Jerusalem temple and john the baptist’s Jordan river baptism - forgiving sins outside of the temple.

The conflict between Jews and Samaritans is a different thing altogether from the Jews and the Gentiles - the migrant merchant class in colonised Palestine.

Mathew 10: 5
These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. 6Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel.

The usual interpretation of this is to avoid the Samaritans and the lost sheep were those who had lost their way in lifes ongoing struggles, but I wonder if the real message was to avoid the cities of the Kingdom of Israel as they were where the Gentile class were located. The faithfull, like in Judea, existed in the wilderness. The city is very often the symbol of Sin and corruption throughout the bible and I wonder if that paradigm is also at play in the Mathew direction to go to the lost sheep but not into Samaritan cities.

The Maccabean revolt less than 200 years earlier was based around the faithfull leaving the cities and living in the bush.

If, as it seems to me, Jesus is saying go to the children of David, the Samaritans, but avoid the corrupted centres dominated by Gentiles, this gives a very different meaning to the story of the woman at the well.

If this story is looked at with the assumption that the woman herself was amongst the lost sheep of Israel then the story takes on a completely different meaning. Same with the parable of the Good Samaritan.

Perhaps, when Jesus says “It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” He is not talking about throwing Jewish food to Samaritan dogs, but rather refering to the poverty of the Samaritans (and the woman’s child in particular) being expropriated by the Gentile dogs. - economic imperialism and colonisation. Perhaps the message is not about the great distance between jews and Samaritans but rather, in the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of David, the Jews and Samaritans are one, the only division existing in the different understandings of the corrupt Jerusalem temple.

The woman’s response ….”Yes, Lord,” she said, “but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.” was perhaps not a self deprecating acceptance of her status as dog but rather an assertion that even the invading gentile dogs are subject to the God of Israel. (as reinforced in the story of Jesus healing the centurion’s relative/slave).

Write a comment